- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:55:30 +0100
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4B72D6F2.8060008@kosek.cz>
Grosso, Paul wrote: > 12. xml-model > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas > > We have published a first draft for public comment at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/ > and Paul announced it on chairs@w3.org at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2010JanMar/0028 To my knowledge there seems to be three technical issues now. 1. There should be additional pseudo-attribute for identifying schema language used (for schemas that has media type application/xml). see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jan/0050.html - open questions: - how to name such pseudo-attribute - should it hold just namespace URI or list of namespace URIs (to handle situations like RELAX NG schema with embedded schematron) 2. Additional pseudo-attributes should be allowed because in future we can add new schema-specific pseudo-attributes like phase see comments fro MSMQ or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2010JanMar/0000.html 3. Handling of conflicting media types see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2010JanMar/0001.html Personally, I don't have strong position on this. I have always though that type is useful only when you fetch resource from local filesystem where HTTP is not involved and media type can't be delivered via Content-type HTTP header. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:56:07 UTC