- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:28:32 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m24olq17db.fsf@nwalsh.com>
> 9. XLink 1.1. I published new drafts a couple of days ago. Or maybe yesterday. But I did it ;-) > Norm has prepared an updated DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ [...] > ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly. Now updated. I think 5 is resolved, though I'm not sure. It looks like Henry left 8 dangling. > The latest editor's draft (24 January 2010) is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html > > Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful > and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices). > Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3. > But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will > remove the default for xlink:type. Where will we remove this? > Norm created an updated IR at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html > > ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR. Done. > A diff between 1.0 and the latest PR ready draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html > > ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC and IR. Done. > ACTION to Norm: Make the latest draft a PR. Done. > ACTION to Norm: Also produce a diff between the Xlink 1.1 CR > and this latest draft. Done. Well, I did it between the last published draft and this draft. I could go back to the previous CR as well, if you want. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Vision is the art of seeing things http://nwalsh.com/ | invisible.-- Swift
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 20:29:08 UTC