W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: XLink 1.1 REC draft available

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:32:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3021314B7AD@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The pointer to the errata document should be in
date space, so it should be
and someone needs to put a stub document there.

The link to the implementation report is to a member-only location.
I'm sorry I didn't notice this earlier.  The public IR is at

Norm, can you just copy the contents of
and update the document for this and the errata pointer
(and put a stub errata doc in place)?

I couldn't find the .xml document.  Where is it?  And does it
point to the right stylesheet?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 April 21 11:14
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XLink 1.1 REC draft available
> >> ACTION to Norm as editor:  Produce a REC-ready draft, correcting
> >> a typo and adding a brief appendix outlining changes between
> >> XLink 1.0 and XLink 1.1.
> Done, I believe:
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html
> I haven't staged it anywhere yet. If you don't like the new appendix
> please let me know.
> Liam, if I've borked the status section in some way, please let me
> know.
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One stops being a child when one
> http://nwalsh.com/            | realizes that telling one's trouble
>                               | does not make it better.--Cesare
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:33:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:40 UTC