- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:32:36 -0400
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The pointer to the errata document should be in date space, so it should be http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/xlink-11-errata.html and someone needs to put a stub document there. The link to the implementation report is to a member-only location. I'm sorry I didn't notice this earlier. The public IR is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/xlink11-implementation Norm, can you just copy the contents of http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html into http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/xlink11-implementation and update the document for this and the errata pointer (and put a stub errata doc in place)? I couldn't find the .xml document. Where is it? And does it point to the right stylesheet? paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 2010 April 21 11:14 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: XLink 1.1 REC draft available > > >> ACTION to Norm as editor: Produce a REC-ready draft, correcting > >> a typo and adding a brief appendix outlining changes between > >> XLink 1.0 and XLink 1.1. > > Done, I believe: > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html > > I haven't staged it anywhere yet. If you don't like the new appendix E, > please let me know. > > Liam, if I've borked the status section in some way, please let me > know. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One stops being a child when one > http://nwalsh.com/ | realizes that telling one's trouble > | does not make it better.--Cesare Pavese
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:33:20 UTC