- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:16:26 +0200
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, Can we delay the discussion about xml-model, since SC 34/WG 1 has a new proposal to make on the way we could go forward with this specification ? Regards, Mohamed On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > In case our bi-weekly telcon agenda is getting too large to read > before our meetings, here are the top several items I want to > cover this week--see the full agenda for more details and relevant > references. We have plenty of other open items, but the following > are at the top of my list this week. > > > SC 34/WG 1 use of xml-model PI > ------------------------------ > We need to decide if we are going to allow SC 34/WG 1 to > use xml-model given the responses to date and whether we > will issue a WG Note that parallels the ISO document > defining use of xml-model. > > > NS 1.0 3rd Ed PER > ----------------- > The PER review period has ended. Henry, what is the status? > > > XLink 1.1 > --------- > Have Henry and Norm resolved all the "which DTDs/XSDs" issues? > > Do we have a diff between 1.0 and the 1.1 PR ready draft? > > Is the implementation report sufficient, and is it time to > request transition to PR? > > > AssocSS > ------- > Discuss issues with the latest editor's draft. > > > > > paul > > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:17:13 UTC