- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:20:29 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Simon Pieters a écrit : > Could you elaborate on why you think this would be better? The stated intent (para just above section 4) is to make the definition of "Processing instructions with pseudo-attributes" (hereinafter PIPAs) reusable by other specs. But such other specs may not want PIs that are not PIPAs to be ignored, they may want them to be treated differently or whatever. In fact, thinking about it more, it seems that this is also what we want in this spec. We want to provide a way to recognize (and act upon) certain PIs, but we certainly do not want to force user agents to ignore any other PIs. Yet, as the draft stands, it appears to force user agents wanting to claim conformance to this spec to completely ignore any PI that is not a PIPA, anywhere in the document. We should be careful to say something like "...must ignore for purposes of stylesheet linking" or something like that. -- François
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:21:03 UTC