- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:35:50 -0400
- To: "XML CORE" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
September 9, from
08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
15:00-16:00 UTC
16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.
***************************************************
Paul and Norm send regrets. Henry will chair.
***************************************************
Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
The next Technical Plenary (and AC meeting) week (TPAC week)
will be Nov 2-6 in Santa Clara, California:
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/TPAC/Overview.html
The XML Core WG is planning to meet f2f during that week.
Registration is now open:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC09/
----
Addison Phillips of I18N sent email about
Unicode Normalization in XML 1.0 5th Ed.; see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0019
We have agreed on a note to add; see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jun/0059
ACTION to Francois: Process the suggested additional note
as an erratum to XML 1.0 5th Edition.
-----
HTML request for clearer XML serialization
------------------------------------------
Henry raised the issue that HTML folks think the XML
spec is broken because it doesn't define error recovery
and doesn't discuss serialization.
Simon added his understanding of the issue at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jun/0007
(second half of the message) and a thread starting with a
reply from John ensued at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jun/thread.ht
ml#msg8
Perhaps with this email beginning, Henry only needs to reply
to that thread to complete the following:
ACTION to Henry: Send email to the XML Core WG list
outlining the suggestion to define a serialization spec
including the rationale.
-----
SC 34/WG 1 use of xml-model PI
------------------------------
We had responded to an SC 34/WG1 request to be able to use xml-model
for a PI target. Our response is at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0011
I just received a partial response from our liaison which I have
archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2009Sep/0011
(member-only) [at Jirka's request, but we can minute our discussion in
these minutes that will be posted to our publicly readable archive].
3. XML 1.0
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
The XML 1.0 5th Edition Recommendation is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/
Henry forwarded some email from Makoto about the 5th Ed at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0024
4. XML Test Suite.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite
issues raised by Frans Englich:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata
The NS PE doc is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html
NS 1.0 3rd Ed is in PER at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xml-names-20090806/
until 2009-09-14.
6. LEIRIs
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
The WG Note defining LEIRIs is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/
The following specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs:
XML 1.0 6th Edition
XML 1.1 3rd Edition
XML Base 2nd Edition
XLink 1.1 (First Edition)
XInclude 3rd Edition
7. xml:id
The xml:id Recommendation is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/
John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009
At one point we thought we had Consensus:
The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes
that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate
xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted.
But they we reconsidered. Henry sent further email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0048
We did agree that applying xml:id processing does not have
any impact on the DTD/XSD validity of the document.
John re-summarized his thoughts at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0008
ACTION to Henry (and others): Continue the xml:id issue
discussion in email.
---
Richard pointed out the following note in XML Base
(just before section 3.1):
This specification does not give the xml:base attribute
any special status as far as XML validity is concerned.
In a valid document the attribute must be declared in
the DTD, and similar considerations apply to other schema
languages.
and suggested a similar note should go into xml:id in D.1.
---
There was also some email about some typos for which we (Henry)
should process an editorial erratum:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050
ACTION to Henry: Process an xml:id erratum to correct the typos; ref
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050
8. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd Rec
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
The XML Base 2nd Edition Recommendation is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xmlbase-20090128/
9. XLink 1.1.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
The earlier XLink CR was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/
The XLink 1.1 LC was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/
The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.
Norm has prepared an updated DoC at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
Paul summarized the open issues at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0045
Norm replied at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0009
ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly.
The latest editor's draft (of the PR) is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/
and a diff-with-the-last-CR draft is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html
We are still fiddling to get the correct DTDs/XSDs/RNCs in.
John sent email about this at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jul/0039.html
ACTION to Henry: Update the DTDs (both for full
and simple conformance) so that the xlink:type attribute has no
default (e.g., is #IMPLIED).
Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful
and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices).
Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3.
But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will
remove the default for xlink:type.
Henry sent an XML Schema for simple-conformant XLink at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0019
ACTION to Norm: Update the draft with the correct DTD, XSD, and RNC.
We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR.
Paul drafted a PR transition request at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013
Norm created an updated IR at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html
ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR.
ACTION to Norm: Create a diff between 1.0 and the 1.1 PR ready draft.
10. XInclude 3rd Edition
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
XInclude 2nd Edition is at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115
See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for
LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition.
ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed
with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
11. Associating Stylesheets.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at:
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/
The Errata document is at:
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
The latest issues document with CONSENSUS resolutions is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/06/assocss-issues.htm
Simon made a start at
http://simon.html5.org/specs/xml-stylesheet
ACTION to Henry and Simon: Produce a draft of the AssocSS 2nd Ed PER.
paul
[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Aug/0026
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 15:39:13 UTC