W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > November 2009

Re: XML namespaces on the Web

From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:22:46 -0500
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20091119132246.GQ22383@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:47:15PM +0000, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Now, I'd like to ask from everyone who has argued the position that the
> Application may continue processing the stream after the XML 1.0 Processor
> has signaled a fatal error:
>  * Do you believe the above construction black-box-testably constitutes an
>  XML 1.0 Processor and (a part of) an Application? (If not, why not?)
>  * Do you believe the construction subverts the intent of the XML 1.0 spec?
>  (If not, why not?)

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/08/16/specs
(to be read as a humorous take, of course).



-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 13:23:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:40 UTC