- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:05:25 GMT
- To: hsivonen@iki.fi
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Using something that doesn't name an old version of MathML gets you > the YSoD in shipped Gecko well if your document is targetting shipped gecko then you will restrict to mathml2 (and only some parts of html5) anyway so using a mathml2 doctype would be pretty reasonable. But (whatever Mozilla's actual plans, which aren't directly relevant to the spec) the spec should be written assuming that rendering engines will appear sometime in the future that implement html5 and mathml3. If a document is using a new mathml3 feature such as dir="rtl" for Arabic layout then it isn't going to work in currently shipped products whatever doctype you put at the top. Saying that documents using those features use a mathml2 doctype is forcing weirdness on the entire future just to cope with a temporary problem in the transition. > It doesn't make the document invalid if you use a non-legacy > validation mechanism and turn off DTD validation. (To pre-empt > concerns like this, Validator.nu doesn't let you enable DTD validation > even as an option.) Saying that it's OK to make the XML usage fragile and weird because people can use non xml tools doesn't really address the problem. The majority of people are clearly going to use the html serialisation, people who choose to use the xml serialisation presumably do it for a reason, and compatiblity with dtd validating xml tools is one perfectly good reason. > If the conclusion is to mint a new entity-enabling public id instead of > using the one that is backwards-compatible with shipped Gecko, then > definitely the public id should be something like the above and not > suggest anything about a particular HTML or MathML spec level/version to > avoid the perceived need to mint yet another public id in the future. Agreed there, which is why we forked the whole entities stuff out of the mathml spec, but my suggestion would be to arrange the effective entity resolver such that the end user never really needs to know this id at all and (in a browser-like context for application/xhtml+xml) always unconditionally act as if this doctype had been used rather than manintaining a special list of doctype id that trigger this. If you freeze a special list then (as noted above) it becomes more and more disconected from reality as languages are revised, or the browser has to keep making the list longer, neither of which is ideal. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 14:05:58 UTC