- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:16:23 +0000
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- CC: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, "public-xml-core-wg@w3.org" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41:24 +0100, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote: >> >>> Simon Pieters scripsit: >>> >>>> What is being discussed is not adding predefined entities. What is being >>>> discussed is making certain doctypes map to DTDs that contain just entity >>>> declarations (which is what Firefox, WebKit and Opera do today). >>> Well, any non-validating parser is free to do that today. (It's not quite >>> clear to me from the XML Rec whether a validating parser is compelled >>> to actually read an external DTD subset, or whether it may simply assume >>> what it contains.) >>> >>> The downside is that some non-validating parsers, those that do not read >>> the external subset, will reject the document as not well-formed. >> Or they can fail to expand the entities without a fatal error (like Opera >> does). Either way, this is exactly the issue. If I understand Alexey >> correctly, he wants to remove the downside by having a requirement that UAs >> have the mapping for a handful of doctypes. >> >> -- >> Simon Pieters >> Opera Software >> >> > But isn't Opera's approach in violation of the XML specification? I > don't consider myself an XML expert, but my understanding is that an > unparsed entity is a fatal error, and an unrecognized entity is an > unparsed entity. It's only a fatal error if you are a validating parser. You're free to do as you please with the error you get with a non-validating parser and there are external entities in the document. -- Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software <http://gsnedders.com/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2009 14:06:31 UTC