- From: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:06:38 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5436D536.D5D39949-ON85257587.008395D1-85257588.000098A4@us.ibm.com>
Perhaps I am missing something, but given the phrase in the constraint itself of "except as defined by later specifications" isn't Pointer Methods in RDF an example of just the sort of specifications that we reserve these things for? Or do we really expect to eventually need every token that begins with "[xX][mM][lL]" for just the set of core XML specifications? Regards, Glenn Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes: > >> The first is a bit trivial, but...they define an element (an RDF > >> property actually, but one that's serialized as an element) named > >> "ptr:XMLNamespace". I believe that technically we own all local names > >> that begin "[Xx][Mm][Ll]". > > > > See the sentence immediately after the namespace constraint > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#xmlReserved > > Right. But I'm not sure we'll win any friends if we get grumpy about it. > > Be seeing you, > norm >
Received on Sunday, 29 March 2009 00:07:37 UTC