- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:59:54 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, 2009 July 27 8:56 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Grosso, Paul writes: > > >> > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N: > >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055 > >> > >> > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed. > >> > Paul informed XML Security at > >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054 > >> > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at > >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058 > >> > >> Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . . > > > > That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22, > > that was not a separate action. > > Prefix undeclaration is not mentioned in NPE20 or 22. I'm still > confused. No, sorry, I'm confused. I copied too much from an earlier message, and then I didn't reread it when I answered your last email. Ignore this noise. paul
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 14:00:36 UTC