- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:57:40 +0100
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ht writes:
> I think what we should do is move towards something like the
> following:
>
> [1] StyleSheetPI ::= PI (linked to REC-xml#NT-PI)
> ::= '<?xml-stylesheet' PIBody '?>'
> [That is, an xml-stylesheet processing
> instruction *must* satisfy _both_ productions]
>
> [1a] PIBody ::= (S PseudoAtt)* S?
Further to our discussion on the XML Core WG telcon today, I propose a
modification of this, as suggested by Paul:
[1] StyleSheetPI ::= '<?xml-stylesheet' PIBody '?>'
[XSSC: XML PI]
[1a] PIBody ::= (S PseudoAtt)* S?
Somewhere we then have this:
[XSSC: a StyleSheetPI *must* be an XML processing instruction
(ref. REC-xml#NT-PI)]
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKXfx4kjnJixAXWBoRAuxJAJ9KQWMqoivqS3OWuWL5kJIgUgaAYwCfWe+8
9a+joCVOkYG3Kt4XIw+8UrQ=
=tPg/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 15:58:21 UTC