- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:28:05 -0700
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Ditto and ditto. -- François John Cowan a écrit : > Henry S. Thompson scripsit: > >> One AC review of the XML 1.0 PER draft said >> >> - Appendix J would be better if it suggested that all names comply >> with normalization form C (<http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/>) > > No problem with that. > >> - Item 4 in Appendix J will have regional exceptions. A couple of >> regional exceptions are already listed, but those should be viewed >> as example exceptions rather than unique ones. For example, Eszett >> is still used in some Germanic regions (but not all) > > My response is the same as before: the point may be good but the > example given is not, since Eszett is not now, nor has it ever been, > a compatibility character. >
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 16:31:59 UTC