- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:37:16 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be September 24. Status and open actions ======================= XML 1.0 5th Edition ------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ The PER period ended 16 May 2008. A preliminary implementation report is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation Henry sent a status summary email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Sep/0011 Henry has started a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xml-5e/disposition.html ACTION to Henry: Send email to Francois asking his opinion on the Unicode issues raised in AC comments outlined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Sep/0011 ACTION to Henry: Take charge of adding a sentence to the para in the SoTD addressing issue ac-2 and issue vanderVlist-1. ACTION to Henry: Add rationales to the XML 1.0 Errata document (addressing issue kesselman-1). ACTION to Henry: Draft a response to all the process complaints. XML Test Suite -------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html CONSENSUS to approve NPE 27, 28, and 30. ACTION to Richard: Update the NPE and Errata documents to reflect the latest status of NPE 27, 28, and 30. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. We need to consider what to do about allowing IRIs (or LEIRIs?) as namespace names in NS 1.0 and what to do about undeclaring namespace prefix bindings in NS 1.0. John sent email asking the I18N Core how they feel about changing NS1.0 to allow IRIs (instead of just URIs) for namespace names: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2008JulSep/0049 and there was some email discussion--see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2008JulSep/thread. html#msg49 LEIRIs ------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 Martin's has made a new latest version available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-04 Martin has asked us to review it and supply tests; see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0002 Addison Phillips of I18N Core recommends we consider publishing LEIRIs as a WG Note; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0004 Henry now feels we should publish a WG Note defining LEIRIs. We need a volunteer to be the editor of the LEIRI-defining WG Note. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER ---------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ and announced at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. Richard developed an initial draft DoC document for XML Base at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html ACTION to Paul and Richard: Work at getting the DoC finalized. Eventual ACTION to Henry: Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for XLink at an accessible URI. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for each of our conformance levels. ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level conformance XSD for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 14:39:52 UTC