- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:06:42 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, September 10, from 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:00-16:00 UTC 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Regrets from Norm. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. October Technical Plenary ------------------------- The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html The XML Core WG will not be holding a f2f at TPAC. --- Henry raised an issue concerning XPath2 fn:id() at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Sep/0002 ff 3. XML 1.0 See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ The PER period ended 16 May 2008. We need to have at least three implementations that pass the test suite for each of the errata that have been newly applied to the 5th Edition. A preliminary implementation report is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation We appear to have three implementations of XML 1.0 5th Edition. Henry is working on next steps. ACTION to Henry: Work on taking XML 1.0 5th Edition to Recommendation. 4. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed some test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html NPE27, 28, and 30 are in countdown until this week's telcon. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. We have an open issue about if/how to add a namespace undeclaring capability that can be used with XML 1.0. Henry suggested we apply the URI -> IRI erratum to NS 1.0 and take that to PER and ask for opinions about what to do about undeclaring. Paul started a thread (imported from www-tag) about whether NS 1.0 should allow IRIs (or LEIRIs?) as namespace names: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0005 John sent email asking the I18N Core how they feel about changing NS1.0 to allow IRIs (instead of just URIs) for namespace names: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2008JulSep/0049 And there was some email discussion--see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2008JulSep/thread. html#msg49 6. LEIRIs See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 Martin's has made a new latest version available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-04 Martin has asked us to review it and supply tests; see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0002 Addison Phillips of I18N Core recommends we consider publishing LEIRIs as a WG Note; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0004 7. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ and announced at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. We have some comments in the comments list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0003 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0011 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0012 We discussed the XHTML WG comment at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0011 a bit. Norm responded to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0011 at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/ 0000 Richard's latest draft as of 2008 August 27 is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ Richard reviewed and suggest a response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0003 at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0032 ACTION to Richard: Send the response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0032 to the commentor and comments list. ACTION to Richard: Develop a DoC document for XML Base. We noted that the XHMTL WG raised a question about process at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0012 saying: We are not convinced that the proposed changes fall within the process guidelines of what new features may be added to a recommendation. ACTION to Henry: Check with W3M about whether there is any process concern with our XML Base PER. 8. XLink 1.1. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The earlier XLink CR was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ The XLink 1.1 LC was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for XLink at an accessible URI. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for each of our conformance levels. ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level conformance XSD for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. 9. XInclude 3rd Edition See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Aug/0034
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 15:09:32 UTC