XML Base DoC [was: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2008 November 19]

So let's see if I understand the DoC notation.

For each issue, following the issue identifier, there is
a parenthesized pair of words.  Am I correct to understand
that a second word value of "agreed" means the commentor
agreed with our disposition?  (At first I thought it meant
the WG agreed with the comment, so this isn't really 
obvious.)  If so, it would be nice if the word "agreed"
had a green background.

Assuming I am correct about my assumption above, how do I 
find the email showing that agreement?  It would be best if 
the word "agreed" was a link to the commentor's acceptance email.

What's the difference between "pending" and "silent"?  In
any case, if we give "agreed" a green background, we should
give these a yellow background.  (A red background would be
for an official objection.)

The field that says "response" is ambiguous.  I wasn't sure
at first whether it was the WG response or the commentors
response to our disposition.  It would be clearer if we
said "Disposition" instead of "Response".

I've just sent Steven a request for acceptance for forms-4.
If he answers in time, we can mark this one "agreed".

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 2008 November 19 7:26
> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2008 November 19
> 
> > ACTION to Richard:  Update the DoC pointing to our response to
> > the commentor and their acceptance, if any.  See also
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Sep/0015
> > for more suggestions on how to present the DoC.
> 
> I have updated the DoC at
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html
> 
> The remaining issues are:
> 
> zamir-1:
> I have added a Note to section 4.2 saying that base URIs are 
> inherited.
> No response from the commenter.
> 
> forms-4:
> I have added a paragraph along the lines discussed.
> No response, but since it is exactly what they wanted I think we can
> assume acceptance.
> 
> xhtml2-1:
> This is the process issue.
> No response.  Since the change is not substantive we don't believe
> the comment applies.
> 
> -- Richard
> 
> -- 
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 14:46:10 UTC