- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:58:11 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be November 19. Status and open actions ======================= XML 1.0 5th Edition ------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ An implementation report is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation The DoC is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xml-5e/disposition.html The latest almost-Rec-ready draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/XML5e/ ACTION to Henry: Organize a transition telcon for XML 1.0 5th Ed. XML Test Suite -------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html Richard added some discussion at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. ACTION to Richard: Add an NPE changing URIs to IRIs in NS 1.0. In NS 1.0, NCName is defined to start with NCNameStartChar which is defined in NS 1.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#NT-NCNameStartChar to be Letter | '_' where Letter is defined in XML 1.0, and Letter in XML 1.0 5th Ed does not include all the characters allowed as the initial character of a Name in XML 1.0 5th Ed. We could redefine NS 1.0 NCName as Name (from XML) without colon and leave the now orphaned NCNameChar and NCNameStartChar productions in case other specs reference them--we may need to update them appropriately to reflect XML 1.0 5th Ed changes. ACTION to Henry and Richard: Make a specific proposal for changing the NS 1.0 spec to address this NCNameStartChar problem. We need to be sure we check back with James on our suggested resolution. LEIRIs ------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 The WG Note defining LEIRIs is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/ The mailing list for comments is wrong. ACTION to Henry: Fix the LEIRI WG Note's SOTD to point to xml-editor for the comments. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER ---------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ and announced at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. Richard developed an initial draft DoC document for XML Base at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html ACTION to Richard: Finalize the DoC. ACTION to Richard: Update the spec to reference the LEIRI note. ACTION to Henry: Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for XLink at an accessible URI. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for each of our conformance levels. ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level conformance XSD for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 14:59:30 UTC