- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:08:29 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Thanks, Henry. I just sent in the pub request. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll assume you'll be able to address the rest of what needs to be done to get this out for PER. thanks, paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, 2008 March 18 9:53 > To: steve@w3.org > Cc: Grosso, Paul; Philippe Le Hegaret; timbl@w3.org; > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; webreq@w3.org > Subject: Re: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML > Base Second Edition > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Steve Bratt writes: > > > I was ready to say "go ahead". Then there has been a flurry of > > emails with this same subject line that I simply do not have time to > > follow and understand. I've asked PLH and Henry to summarize the > > state and conclusion of these, and have not heard back yet. What is > > the issue? > > The PER request is for XML Base, but the email exchange is mostly > about XLink. > > Half the exchange is about timing of RFCs, and the rest is about > whether SVG should reference LEIRIs or IRIs. But that's a discussion > for SVG. > > None of the exchange is about the XML Base PER. > > In other words, none of the exchange actually bears on the question of > whether XML Base should go to PER -- rather it's discussion stimulated > by people having their attention called to the new draft RFC. > > I still don't think we need a call, and that we can go ahead with > publication on 20 March. In other words, I think if we _had_ a call, > we would decide that none of the email exchange actually addressed the > entry conditions to PER, and so we would decide to go ahead. It would > just slow us down to the point where we miss the publication > moratorium. > > ht > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, > University of Edinburgh > Half-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) > 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without > it is forged spam] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFH39c6kjnJixAXWBoRAu1YAJ4wjcn5rCKW8xaRQutT5y0ebi7mVQCfWKcU > eTGIi/bRM6hUg4O6Jx8fC/c= > =KpOo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:09:19 UTC