- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:52:27 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 2008 June 04 10:41 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2008 June 4 > | 4. XML 1.0 > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > | > | The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > | > | The PER period ended 16 May 2008. > Are there any additional tests needed? Perhaps a test about > version=1.7 documents. Well, do we or don't we? What was the decision? Did someone take an action to add such a test? > > If 5e is published, then a version=1.2 document could be rejected > by an XML 1.1 parser but accepted by an XML 1.0 parser. > > Some discussion of rescinding XML 1.1. That would mean doing > something about prefix undeclaration. That is, prefix undeclaration in Namespace 1.0, correct? paul
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 21:53:16 UTC