XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2008 July 7

The XML Core WG telcons are every other week.

Our next telcon will be July 16.


Status and open actions
=======================

C14N 1.1
--------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#c14n1.1

The C14N 1.1 Recommendation has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/


XML 1.0 5th Edition
-------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata

The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/

The PER period ended 16 May 2008.

ACTION to Richard, Henry:  Add a test to the XML 1.0 5th Ed 
Test Suite about version=1.7 documents.

A preliminary implementation report is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation

ACTION to DV:  Give update on status for implementing 
XML 1.0 5th Edition.

ACTION to Glenn:  Check with Apache folks on status of
implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition.


XML 1.1
-------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml1.1


XML Test Suite
--------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite

Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 

ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues.


Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1
-------------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.

Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html

ACTION to Richard:  Fill in proposed resolutions for NPE27-30.


LEIRIs
------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri

Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) has
expired; a copy is at 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02

A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045

ACTION to Henry:  Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis
pointing out that having the IRI-bis draft expired is a serious 
problem for us.


XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER
----------------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base

The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/
and announced at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112

The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008.

We have some comments in the comments list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0003
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0012

We discussed the XHTML WG comment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0011
a bit.

The IRI-bis does allow x00-1F in LEIRIs, but such LEIRIs cannot
be expressed in an XML document.  The set of LEIRIs that can be
expressed in an XML document is identical to what was always
allowed in XML documents.  See, for example:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#escaping
in XML Base 1.0.  What we have in XML Base 1.1 is identical to
what we allow in XML Base 1.0.

ACTION to Norm: Respond to 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0011
explaining ourselves and suggesting the additional of a
clarificatory sentence.

ACTION to Richard:  Review and suggest a response to
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
0003
and develop a DoC document.


XLink 1.1
---------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1

The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/

The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.

Norm has prepared a DoC at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/

ACTION to Henry:  Continue to get the XSD for
XLink at an accessible URI.

John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for
each of our conformance levels.

ACTION to Henry, John:  Think about having a basic level
conformance XSD for XLink.

Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR.

ACTION to Henry:  Review the history and make a recommendation
as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR.


XInclude 3rd Edition PER
------------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude

XInclude 2nd Edition is at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115

ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed
with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.

Received on Monday, 7 July 2008 14:57:07 UTC