RE: XML 1.0 PER

I don't see how it matters.  Besdies, we're just talking about
a PER, not a Rec whose date will live for a while.

paul 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Liam Quin
> Sent: Thursday, 2008 January 10 18:19
> To: François Yergeau
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; Philippe Le Hegaret
> Subject: Re: XML 1.0 PER
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:41:22PM -0800, François Yergeau wrote:
> > 
> > I just uploaded a set of files for the XML 1.0 5th ed. PER:
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > This is almost ready to go, with a planned publication date 
> of Feb 5. 
> > All errata and PEs except PE164 are incorporated.
> 
> A question about this... Feb 10th is the 10th anniversary of
> the first W3C XML Recommendation.  Might it be better either to
> wait two weeks, or to be a week earlier?
> 
> Liam
> 
> -- 
> Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 15:48:50 UTC