- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:11:25 -0700
- To: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 07:12:59 UTC
I don't see how that answers my concern about XML. Some (many) don't. Like Java. Like XML Spy. This conversation started from saying Gee if you're going to *require* an update to XML 1.0, then this is something else that could be *required* as well. "Some do" is a *may* not a *must*. Just out of curiosity, can you stick an xinclude in the middle of an attribute value? John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> 10/30/2007 07:05 PM To Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com> cc John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org Subject Re: XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:51:10PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:45:30AM -0700, John Boyer wrote: >> Just speaking for myself, xinclude doesn't seem to do the job because xslt >> engines don't resolve xincludes, but they do resolve external entity >> references. > > Depend which ones... there is nothing preventing XInclude and XSLT being > glued together. Right. And some do, of course :-) Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 07:12:59 UTC