- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:15:53 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Paul Konrad John Glenn Norm Richard Philippe xx:29 Daniel [8 organizations (8 with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Henry Absent organizations -------------------- François Yergeau Norm gives regrets for Oct 24th. > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. The draft agenda for the TP week f2f is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/09/xml-f2f-20071105-agenda.htm > EXI first WD > ------------ > Title: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0 > Pre pub URI: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/EXI/docs/format/exi.html > Post pub TR URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/ > > John's review is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0012 > > ACTION to John: Send in the technical comments with a note > that we have higher level comments to come. ACTION to John: Check to see if you fulfilled the above action. > > 3. C14N > > The C14N 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621 > > Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) WG Note > has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-issues-20061220/ > > Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment > WG Note has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSig-usage-20061220/ > > Regarding C14N 1.1: > Konrad had pointed out some issues with Appendix A. He sent email > with the latest suggested updated version of Appendix A and examples: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/0050 > > There is another thread on C14N 1.1 at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/thread.html#msg18 Interoperability testing was performed on 27 September. A report of the outcome is at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2007Oct/0000 Regarding the change from 1.0 to 1.1 highlighted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0018 we will revert to 1.0 wording. Regarding point 2 of the interoperability email, it sounds like the issue is explained well in the email. Glenn will try to propose some wording to the XML Core list. ACTION to Glenn: Propose some new wording to address point 2 of the interoperability testing feedback email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2007Oct/0000 Point 3 complains about appendix A being too difficult to understand, partly because it uses 3986 language which is also hard to understand. We have three choices: 1. say hard to understand isn't wrong, so leave it as is. 2. delete appendix A altogether, possibly adding to the main text if there is anything "normative" only mentioned in the existing appendix. 3. rewrite appendix A. ACTION to Konrad: Send us pointers to suggestions for rewriting appendix A. One such pointer is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Sep/0017 > > 4. xml:base, [baseURI], and IRIs -> HRRIs > > The (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xmlbase-20061220/ > > It's now waiting for us to say what should happen next--whether > we want a Director's call now or not. > > We need to remember to correct the IP part of the Status section per > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2007JanMar/0000 > > Mike Kay thinks the defn of XML Resource Identifier is too vague. > > We decided to write an RFC to define XML Resource Identifier. > The plan is to get this to an RFC and then reference it from > XML Base (which we can then take to REC) and others. > > > 4.5. HRRI RFC > > The latest HRRI draft was published as an ID on May 14 at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01.txt > > The most recent editor's draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/04/hrri/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01c.html > > Henry sent email to I18N Core suggesting our LEIRI solution at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0032 > > We received a reply at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Sep/0008 > > We are still awaiting comments from Martin and a sugggested > schedule for the RFC update from I18N Core. > > > 5. XLink update. > > The XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The latest almost PR-ready XLink draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ > > Norm posted a DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/10/xlink11-doc.html > > Paul wrote a SECOND draft PR request at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Dec/0059 > > ACTION to Norm: Complete resolution of DoC. > > ACTION to WG (need volunteer): Update the Implementation Report. > > ACTION to Norm: Produce PR-ready draft. > > ACTION to Norm: Produce diff/review version. > > HOWEVER, the actions here are pending until we get the HRRI > RFC since we plan to reference it from XLink. > > > 6. XML 1.0/1.1 4th/2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > > The following XML PE are in countdown until THIS telcon: > > PE156 Inclusion of external entities > PE157 UTF-16 and Byte Order Mark > PE158 UTF-8 BOM > PE159 No < in Attribute Values > > See > http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata > for further details > > ---- > > Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > These need to be resolved. > > Richard reports that the 2005 issue has been resolved in the latest > draft. > > The one from 2006, character references with numbers with dozens > of digits, may not be. > > ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. > > > 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > > Richard has recorded Anne's issue/proposed resolution at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata#NPE27 > > > 8. XML 1.1 deployment. Discussion continued. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Sep/0005 >
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:16:12 UTC