- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:34 -0500
- To: "ext Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Paul Yes, the intent is to replace Appendix A with the informational table along with the introductory sentence. We have not yet confirmed the implementations regarding the red-line but I wanted to get the material available as soon as possible for comment and review. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Nov 20, 2007, at 1:02 PM, ext Grosso, Paul wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, 2007 November 20 9:36 >> To: Grosso, Paul; gmarcy@us.ibm.com >> Cc: Frederick Hirsch; XMLSec XMLSec; XML-Core Member; Thomas Roessler >> Subject: v3 proposed changes to C14N11 (sections 2.4, 3.8, >> Appendix A and xml:id) >> >> I've attached a revised red-line and clean version of proposed >> changes to C14N11, incorporating the following changes from the red- >> line we discussed at the F2F: > > Thanks. > >> >> (8) Clarify that table to be added to appendix A, as presented in >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/ > att-0050/ > Apendix_20060625.html > > You say "added to" above, but I thought we decided to delete > the 3986-ish algorith from appendix A entirely, as your > "clean" version seems to imply. > > Am I correct to understand that you are suggesting (as I > believe we decided at the f2f) to replace the current > Appendix A with your suggested introductory sentence > and then the table (but not the algorithm) seen at the > URL you cite above? > > ------- > > Also, per our f2f minutes: > > Then we noticed a problem in the merging process (which > produces the input to the "Appendix A process"): where > 'Base' argument to join-uris ends with "..". 3986 merge > will discard that ".." which is wrong. > > ACTION to Thomas and Frederick: Get implementors to run > this new test case and report the results. > > Am I correct that your latest suggested wording and examples > address this issue? > > Any reports from implementors on this issue? > > paul
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 23:03:26 UTC