- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:36:36 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees ========= Paul Michael SMcQ Liam Richard (on IRC and Zakim) Philippe potential XML 1.0 erratum ========================= Paul sent email to chairs and ac-forum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2007OctDec/0021 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2007OctDec/0059 We have had very little response via email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-blueberry-comments/2007Oct/ Michael Kay would rather not make any changes. Richard would rather not make any changes, but the liberalization of the name char production is the change he is least opposed to. Liam and Henry have talked to several key implementors, and there seems to be general tentative agreement to implement this change if it goes through. What is the next step? We will talk to Ian about possible process, and we will talk to more implementors to see if they will implement it. Whether we allow XML 1.0 processors to accept documents labelled version="1.1" is separate from the name char issue, and we don't know if we are going to try to do that in this erratum too. We asked if unlabelled documents would remain 1.0 or not. MSM would like to say an unlabelled document can be attempted to be processed by any processor whereas right now an unlabelled document can only be a 1.0 document (since the XML declaration is required by XML 1.1). We did not resolve this issue about versions. MSM can live with either an erratum just about name chars or one that also lessens constraints about the value of the version attribute. ------ We agreed that we were done with our agenda for our f2f, so we wouldn't come back to meet officially this afternoon. paul
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:38:11 UTC