- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:42:50 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
FYI, here is an excerpted version of this announcement. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2007JanMar/0069 for the full message. paul -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ac-members-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Ian B. Jacobs Sent: Friday, 2007 March 16 10:06 To: w3c-ac-members@w3.org Subject: XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 is a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations) Dear Advisory Committee Representative, I am pleased to announce that XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 is a W3C Candidate Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xbl-20070316/ . . . There were two Formal Objections. Despite these, the Director supports publishing the XBL2 specification as a Candidate Recommendation; see the full discussion below. This specification will remain at the Candidate Recommendation stage until two complete and interoperable implementations exist (and not before 1 September 2007), as described in the document status section below. There is no initial implementation report. ====================== Disposition of Comments ====================== . . . Finally, for issues 9 and 163 regarding xml:id, the Director supports the decision to not use xml:id, because of the position expressed by certain browser vendors that requirements to support xml:id would be ignored. However, the Director requests that during the Candidate Recommendation phase that the XBL community solicit feedback from authors and implementors on whether XBL should rely exclusively on xml:id instead of having its own "id" attribute. Further, the Director suggests that the XML Coordination Group should discuss xml:id with browser vendors to see if their reluctance can be addressed, e.g. by more clearly defining the rules for the handling of elements with multiple declared IDs. . . .
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 15:43:20 UTC