RE: Fwd: Re: HRRIs, IRIs, etc

At 19:41 07/06/26, Richard Tobin wrote:
>> 2. I think I got the syntactic differences resulting from
>>    the IRI syntax correct in my last mail, but there are
>>    some more restrictions in section 4 (Bidi). In particular,
>>    there is "IRIs MUST NOT contain bidirectional formatting characters
>>    (LRM, RLM, LRE, RLE, LRO, RLO, and PDF)."
>
>Am I right in thinking that the use of these characters in HRRIs would
>be a security risk, because they might change the appearance if the
>HRRI just as a control character might?

Yes, good point.      Regards,   Martin.



#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 07:26:13 UTC