- From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:28:46 +0000
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: webreq@w3.org, timbl@w3.org, Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, Comm Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>
Hi Paul, I couldn't find the link to a preliminary implementation report. Can you add a statement that it doesn't exist (or a link to it)? Also, it must include a link to changes since the previous draft. There's only a link to changes since the previous REC. Can you add this link? Thank you, Jean-Gui Grosso, Paul a écrit : > The XML Core WG requests publication of Canonical XML 1.1 > available at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509.htm > as a Candidate Recommendation. The URL cited above is for the most > recent Member-only version of the specification as of 2007 June 18 > but dated 21 June 2007 in anticipation of that publication date. > That file is set up to be published by moving it to > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.html C14N 1.0 was > published as a Recommendation on 15 March 2001 at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315.html > The C14N 1.1 specification was published on 20 December 2006 > at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/ > as a Last Call Specification. A successful CR transition telcon was > held on 2007 June 15: > http://www.w3.org/2007/06/15-xmlcore-minutes.html (team only). > A review version showing the differences between C14N 1.0 is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509-diff.htm > The WG's decision to request publication as a Candidate > Recommendation was taken during our telcon on 2007 May 23 > whose minutes may be found at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0045 > SCHEDULE > We ask webreq/comm to publish this document on 21 June 2007. > We plan to run the CR period until the end of September 2007. > TITLE, ABSTRACT AND STATUS SECTIONS > Canonical XML 1.1 > ================= > Abstract > -------- > Canonical XML 1.1 is a revision to Canonical XML 1.0 to address > issues related to inheritance of attributes in the XML namespace > when canonicalizing document subsets, including the requirement not > to inherit xml:id, and to treat xml:base URI path processing > properly. > Any XML document is part of a set of XML documents that are > logically equivalent within an application context, but which vary > in physical representation based on syntactic changes permitted by > XML 1.0 [XML] and Namespaces in XML [Names]. This specification > describes a method for generating a physical representation, the > canonical form, of an XML document that accounts for the permissible > changes. Except for limitations regarding a few unusual cases, if > two documents have the same canonical form, then the two documents > are logically equivalent within the given application context. Note > that two documents may have differing canonical forms yet still be > equivalent in a given context based on application-specific > equivalence rules for which no generalized > XML specification could account. > Canonical XML 1.1 is applicable to XML 1.0 and defined in terms of > the XPath 1.0 data model. It is not defined for XML 1.1. > Status of this document > ----------------------- > This section describes the status of this document at the time of > its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list > of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this > technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at > http://www.w3.org/TR/. > Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement > by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, > replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is > inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. > Candidate Recommendation comments on this document are > invited. Comments on this document are due by 30 September 2007, but > earlier comments are expressly solicited. Comments should be sent to > www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org which is an automatically > archived public email list. At this time, there is no implementation > report. A review version with differences between the 1.0 version > highlighted is available. > The XML Core Working Group will advance the specification to > Proposed Recommendation when the following exit criteria have been > met: > * Test documents must have been developed with a range of usages > of attributes in the XML namespace, and correct and compatible > results shown for these tests by at least two implementations. > * A minimum of three months of the CR period must have elapsed. > This document has been produced by the W3C XML Core Working Group as > part of the W3C XML Activity. The authors of this document are the > members of the XML Core Working Group and invited experts from the > Digital Signature community. > This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February > 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent > disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; > that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An > individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual > believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information > in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. > The English version of this specification is the only normative > version. > Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh, chairs of the XML Core WG.
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 09:46:47 UTC