- From: Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:50:29 -0400
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: timbl@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, webreq@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org
Hi Paul, Thanks for this. Everything looks in good order. We would need only a short call. I could also do a "call" within the Team, if your time is short. Let me know what you would like. I'm pretty free this Friday, and Monday afternoon ET. Steve On 6/11/2007 4:35 PM, Grosso, Paul wrote: > The XML Core WG requests publication of > Canonical XML 1.1 > available at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509.htm > as a Candidate Recommendation. > > The URL cited above is for the most recent Member-only > version of the specification as of 9 May 2006 but > dated 21 June 2007 in anticipation of publication then. > > That file is set up to be published by moving it to > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.html > > C14N 1.0 was published as a Recommendation on 15 March 2001 at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315.html > > The C14N 1.1 specification was published on 20 December 2006 > at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/ > as a Last Call Specification. > > The Last Call comments have been considered and resolved, > and a notification of the fact sent to every commenter. > The document being sent to CR contains the changes that > were made to accommodate these comments. > > There is a Disposition of Comments outlining the status at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/05/c14n11-wd-doc.htm > > There are no outstanding objections to our resolution of > comments. > > A review version showing the differences between C14N 1.0 is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509-diff.htm > > The WG's decision to request publication as a Candidate > Recommendation was taken during our telcon on 2007 May 23 > whose minutes may be found at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0045 > > > SCHEDULE > > We propose a publication date of 2007 June 21. > > We propose that the CR period lasts from the date of publication > until 30 September 2007. > > > EXIT CRITERIA > > The XML Core Working Group will advance the specification > to Proposed Recommendation when the following exit criteria > have been met: > > * There are at least two interoperable implementations > of the specification. > > * A minimum of three months of the CR period must have elapsed. > > > PRELIMINARY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT > > There is no preliminary Implementation Report. > > > PROPOSED CR TITLE, ABSTRACT AND STATUS SECTIONS > > Canonical XML 1.1 > > Abstract > -------- > Canonical XML 1.1 is a revision to Canonical XML 1.0 to address > issues related to inheritance of attributes in the XML namespace > when canonicalizing document subsets, including the requirement > not to inherit xml:id, and to treat xml:base URI path processing > properly. > > Any XML document is part of a set of XML documents that are logically > equivalent within an application context, but which vary in physical > representation based on syntactic changes permitted by XML 1.0 [XML] > and Namespaces in XML [Names]. This specification describes a method > for generating a physical representation, the canonical form, of an > XML document that accounts for the permissible changes. Except for > limitations regarding a few unusual cases, if two documents have the > same canonical form, then the two documents are logically equivalent > within the given application context. Note that two documents may have > differing canonical forms yet still be equivalent in a given context > based on application-specific equivalence rules for which no generalized > > XML specification could account. > > Canonical XML 1.1 is applicable to XML 1.0 and defined in terms of the > XPath 1.0 data model. It is not defined for XML 1.1. > > Status of this Document > ----------------------- > This section describes the status of this document at the time of > its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A > list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this > technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index > at http://www.w3.org/TR/. > > Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement > by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, > replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is > inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. > > Candidate Recommendation comments on this document are invited. > Comments on this document are due by 30 September 2007, but earlier > comments are expressly solicited. Comments should be sent to > www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org which is an automatically > archived public email list. At this time, there is no implementation > report. A review version with differences between the 1.0 version > highlighted is available. > > This document has been produced by the W3C XML Core Working Group > as part of the W3C XML Activity. The authors of this document are > the members of the XML Core Working Group and invited experts from > the Digital Signature community. > > This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February > 2004 > W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures > > made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also > includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has > actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains > Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with > section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. > > The English version of this specification is the only normative version. > > > Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh, chairs of the XML Core WG. -- Steven R Bratt, PhD mailto:steve@w3.org Chief Executive Officer World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/ MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 32 Vassar Street, Rm G522, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA / tel: +1.617.253.7697
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 21:51:26 UTC