- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:07:32 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week, but we have cancelled the telcon of July 4. Therefore, our next telcon will be July 18. Status and open actions ======================= XML clarification ----------------- Norm sent email about < in attribute values at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Apr/0006 Glenn's proposed wording is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0024 and slightly modified by http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0030 ACTION to Francois: Add this to the PE document for countdown. C14N 1.1 -------- The C14N 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621 Konrad had pointed out some issues with Appendix A. He sent email with the latest suggested updated version of Appendix A and examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/0050 HRRI RFC -------- The latest HRRI draft was published as an ID on May 14 at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01.txt We are going through Martin's comments. There has been some more email during the last week. See especially the June archive for several threads and various emails on the subject: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/ I'm not sure what progress we will be able to make during July. XML 1.0/1.1 ----------- ACTION to Francois: Update the PE document per previous telcons' decisions. On PE 157, John sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Oct/0036 with his suggested response and a question for the WG: > Should we add specific references to UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, CESU-8, > etc. etc. to 4.3.3? If so, we might as well remove "We consider the > first case first" from Appendix F; it's more than obvious. We agreed that, according to the spec, such a character is not a BOM. We have decided that John's email should be sent to the commentor as a response (done, see [11]), and that the only change resulting from this PE are some editorial changes as outlined in John's email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Dec/0056 ACTION to Francois: Update the PE document with John's editorial changes as the proposed resolution to PE 157. [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2006OctDec/0010 ---- John sent email about a new PE related to UTF-8 BOM at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Dec/0067 proposing the following language as a new paragraph in 4.3.3 for both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1: If the replacement text of an external entity is to begin with the character U+FEFF, and no text declaration is present, then a Byte Order Mark MUST be present, whether the entity is encoded in UTF-8 or UTF-16. ACTION to Francois: Add a new PE per John's comments above and make some suggested resolution wording.
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 14:08:39 UTC