- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: dev-tech-xbl@mozilla.org, public-appformats@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Norman Walsh wrote: > > Apologies for the tardiness in sending these comments. The XML Core WG > has reviewed XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 and offers the following two > comments. > > > 1.4.7. Extension Mechanisms > > Section 1.4.7 speaks of the per-element partition of attribute names. > This is, I think, a holdover from the first edition of Namespaces in > XML. We suggest that it be updated to the terminology in the latest > Namespaces REC. I couldn't work out exactly what the new terminology was from the Namespces in XML spec, but I've tried to fix the spec. Please let me know if it is acceptable. > > 2.16. The id Attribute of XBL Elements > > There is, of course, a historical preceding for naming attributes of > type ID "id". However, we recommend that the attribute of type ID in XBL > 2.0 be spelled "xml:id". I don't understand. Could you elaborate on why you recommend making the attribute name longer? Thanks for your input, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 20:40:18 UTC