Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2007 December 19

Grosso, Paul a écrit :
>> Francois' proposed resolution for the version change is PE163.
>> Paul feels we probably need a bit more prose explaining things,
>> but he is not sure.
>>
> Change:
> 
>  Even though the VersionNum production matches any version
>  number of the form '1.x', XML 1.0 documents SHOULD always
>  specify the version number as '1.0'.
> 
> to:
> 
>  Even though the VersionNum production matches any version
>  number of the form '1.x', XML 1.0 documents SHOULD NOT
>  specify a version number other than '1.0'. 
> 
>        Note
> 
>  When an XML 1.0 processor encounters a document that specifies
>  a 1.x version number other than '1.0', it will process it as
>  a 1.0 document.  This means that an XML 1.0 processor will accept
>  1.x documents provided they do not use any non-1.0 features.

Done, see PE163.  I made the same change to the paragraph added to 1.1 
by PE162, but did not add the Note to this one.

> ACTION to Francois:  Put PE154, PE155, PE160, PE161, PE162, and PE163
> into countdown until January 16.

All done.

> ACTION to Francois:  Augment the status of XML 1.0 5th Ed per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0025

Also done.

PEs at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata

XML 1.0 5th ed. at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/12/PER-xml-20071212-review.html

XML 1.1 3rd ed. at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/12/PER-xml11-20071212-review.html

-- 
François

Received on Thursday, 27 December 2007 21:41:42 UTC