- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:25:29 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, 2007 April 27 6:49 > To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: Internet draft submission: draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00 > > > Why don't we talk about percent-encoding percents? > > Because we don't encode them :-) OK (and I agree that's what the spec currently implies). > > Percent signs in an HRRI are supposed to be escapes that the user has > put it. So you can write "http://example.com/foo bar" or > "http://example.com/foo%20bar". > > > Is "ab%d" an invalid HHRI? > > Yes. OK, I think what confused me is we said "%%%" was invalid rather than saying something simpler and more likely such as "xy%z" was invalid. I was thinking maybe there was something about a string of %'s that was the (only) invalid case, when it's just the case that any % in an HRRI must be followed by two hex digits (because any % in an HRRI is treated as the start of an escape sequence). Thanks for clearing that up for me. paul
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 14:26:09 UTC