RE: Internet draft submission: draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00

Sorry, hit send too soon.  Some more glitches:

The third to last para in section 3 refers to
XML resource identifiers.

So does the second to last.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, 2007 April 25 12:14
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Internet draft submission: draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00
> 
> 
> I have some minor comments that we can keep for
> the next draft/RFC and then I have a question (below). 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2007 April 25 11:49
> > To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; Richard Tobin
> > Subject: Internet draft submission: draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00
> > 
> > Attached, please find a document submitted for publication as
> > an Internet Draft. For your convenience, you will also find a copy
> > of it on the web at:
> 
> fwiw, it still says:
> 
>   such as delimiters and a few ASCII characters
> 
> whereas Richard had suggested
> 
>   such as delimiters and a few other ASCII characters
> 
> in section 2 (Motivation).
> 
> ---
> 
> Richard had also suggestion (in section 2) changing
> 
>   converting that string to an IRI
> 
> to
> 
>   converting that string to a URI or IRI
> 
> ---
> 
> I see we now first mention HRRI in section 3 after the bullet
> points (in fact, in a sentence about what is NOT an HRRI).
> 
> I would prefer to see us first mention it at the beginning
> of section 3, to wit:
> 
>   A Human Readable Resource Identifier (HRRI) is a sequence...
> 
> =========
> 
> I know we discussed this, but now I'm confused.
> 
> Why don't we talk about percent-encoding percents?
> 
> We say "%%%" is an invalid HRRI.  Is "ab%d" an invalid HHRI?
> If not, then don't we need to percent-encode the %?
> 
> And if we are percent-encoding percents, in what way is "%%%" 
> an invalid HRRI?  Shouldn't one percent-encode the percents thereby 
> producing a valid IRI?
> 
> paul
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 17:17:52 UTC