RE: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft of C14N 1.1andtwo WG Notes

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 2006 September 12 11:00
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Jean-Guilhem Rouel; webreq; Liam Quin; Philippe Le 
> Hegaret; Henry S. Thompson; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft 
> of C14N 1.1andtwo WG Notes
> 
> On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:16 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:

> > I would think the latest version of this document that is
> > going to be a NOTE would have NOTE in the URL.  Or were
> > you expecting the Lastest Version URL to change when we
> > finally publish it as a NOTE--having a Latest Version URL
> > that changes seems fairly ironic to me.
> 
> The latest version URI will always be /TR/C14N (or whatever 
> is chosen).
> The "this version" URI will go from WD-C14N-YYYYMMDD to
> NOTE-C14N-YYYYMMDD when it is published as a Note.

I now note that WG Notes do not have "NOTE" in
the "this version" URI (I thought they did--I
sort of think they should, but nevermind).

So this means that the short name for a note
cannot be the same as the short name for any
document that ever was or ever will be a
Recommendation.  

Since the C14N 1.0 Rec's short name is "xml-c14n",
will it be confusing to have the short name 
for the "Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0"
be "c14n" as is currently planned?

paul

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 16:11:29 UTC