Re: Error in "Exclusive Canonicalization Version 1.0 Specification"

I think this was meant to go to the xml-core list...
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C   <tlr@w3.org>





On 2006-09-01 15:31:33 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
> To: Lijun Liao <lijun.liao@rub.de>, Jose' Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
> Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@goatee.net
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:31:33 -0400
> Subject: Re: Error in "Exclusive Canonicalization Version 1.0
> 	Specification"
> List-Id: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Organization: MIT
> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/200609011531.33946.reagle@mit.edu
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 06:40, Lijun Liao wrote:
> > 1. Section 3.1 Constrained Implementation (non-normative)
> >   "5. Insert all the rendered namespace nodes" ... should be "4. Insert 
> > all the rendered namespace nodes". Similiarly for the next item "6. 
> > After the recursion returns" should be "5. After the recursion returns".
> > 2. Section 5.1 Target Context
> >  <Bar/><Foo/></Bar> should be <Bar><Foo/></Bar>
> >  <Baz xmlns="..."/><Foo/></Baz> should be <Baz xmlns="..."><Foo/></Baz>
> 
> Thank you for noticing these typos, I agree they need fixing. However, it 
> appears that the XML Core WG "owns" this specification now:
>   http://www.w3.org/2005/02/xml-core-wg-charter.html
> and I briefly spoke to Jose' earlier this year about some changes they were 
> planning and he said he'd send something along to this list, but I never 
> saw anything.
> 
> In any case, I hope this email will find the right folks at the W3C as I'm 
> not sure people follow this list much anymore.
> 
>

Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 19:57:28 UTC