- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:55:28 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Sounds fine to me (thanks for checking, Henry). Richard, unless you have objections to this plan, please proceed accordingly. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, 2006 October 18 09:52 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2006 October 16 > > Grosso, Paul writes: > > > ACTION to Henry: Check into our options here for doing > > a WD of a PER [of XML Base]. > > I have discussed this with the relevant Policy wonks, and the > consensus is that that would be a Bad Idea, as it would provoke Patent > Policy hassles. The proposed alternative is to publish a public > Editor's Draft, linked from the errata page as a sort of omnibus draft > erratum, with a SoTD saying something along the lines of > > This is a public Editor's Draft, published to encourage review of > the proposed restructuring of this document. Since the changes are > in the nature of corrections for errata, after public review and > possible further modifications in light of comments received, the > group expects to request publication as a PER. > > ht
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 15:00:54 UTC