- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:08:25 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, October 11, from 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:00-16:00 UTC 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe 20:30-21:30 in most of India on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. The QA working group asked Ian Hickson of the Web Application Formats WG to request that the XML Core working group review the XBL2 specification that is currently in Last Call: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/Overview.html?content-type =text/html Editor's copy (more up to date) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ Snapshot for TR page (last call version; outdated) 3. C14N Our three C14N documents have been published: Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) W3C Working Draft 15 September 2006 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-C14N-issues-20060915/ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/C14N-issues/ Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment W3C Working Draft 15 September 2006 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-DSig-usage-20060915/ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/ Canonical XML1.1 W3C Working Draft 15 September 2006 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915 Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11 --- Some notes on the C14N 1.1 WD: Richard thinks the "diff markup" of 3986 is enlightening and should actually appear in the spec. Regarding referencing 3986 instead of 2396, we plan to leave the normative text and references of c14n 1.1 as is for a first public working draft, but to add a note in the "status of this document" section that says that the section on xml:base is expected to evolve along with the group's work on that recommendation. [Actually, we didn't put any such wording into the status.] --- Glenn produced a new editor's draft of C14N 1.1 in response to Konrad's suggestions at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Aug/0046 This latest draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060928.html ACTION to Konrad and others: Please review and send comments to the WG mailing list. --- Jose received a response from Web Services Policy WG at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Oct/0005 4. xml:base, [baseURI], and IRIs. Richard is working on a new draft currently at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ which he updated with a new version Oct 3 (just last week). He has updated most of the references and added a section (5.4) describing the treatment of same-document references. ACTION to Richard: Make a suggestion for replacement of section 5.1. 5. XLink update. The XLink CR was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ Paul wrote a draft PR request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jul/0001 ACTION to Norm: Create an XLink DoC. ACTION to Norm: Post to the WG mailing list something to show that any valid XLink 1.1 document can be programmatically converted into an equivalent XLink 1.0 document. ACTION to Norm: Provide a few more tests for the test suite. The old version XLink in section 5.5, we talk about values of href attributes. In the new version, we talk about IRIs and XML Resource Identifiers and other ways of encoding. So it's unclear now what to do about spaces in href attributes. Compare http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/#link-semantics and the wording above it in section 5.4.1 at http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/#xml-resource-identifier Norm thinks instead of spaces, we should now say non-URI characters. ACTION to Norm: Make a suggestion how best to fix this. Also, nowhere do we say that conversion from an XML Resource Identifier to an IRI must occur as late as possible. Suggested new wording: If required, the IRI reference resulting from converting an XML Resource Identifier can be converted to a URI reference by following the prescriptions of Section 3.1 of [RFC 3987]. The conversion from an XML Resource Identifiers to an IRI must be performed only when absolutely necessary and as late as possible in a processing chain. In particular, neither the process of converting a relative XML Resource Identifier to an absolute one nor the process of passing an XML Resource Identifier to a process or software component responsible for dereferencing it should trigger escaping. ACTION to Norm: Implement the new wording in XLink 1.1. 6. XML 1.0/1.1 4th/2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 Henry has made the "edited in place" changes to the HTML and XML of the non-review copy. ACTION to Henry: Correct the review versions. Richard notes that there were some comments sent to the xml-editor list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2006JulSep/0004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2006JulSep/0005 ACTION to Francois: Add the above two issues to the PE document. 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 ACTION to Richard: Record Anne's issue/proposed resolution in the Namespace PE document. 8. XInclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/ The XInclude Second Edition PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xinclude-20061003/ The Call for Review is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2006OctDec/0001 Please urge your AC rep to complete this review. It turns out XInclude should be under CPP not PP. Henry and Philippe to address in PER with Daniel addressing in the final REC text. 9. Associating stylesheets--awaiting TAG action. Henry reports that the HTML CG has been discussing this for a while. They are developing a draft statement of the issue, and Chris Lilley will raise this at the XML CG. Chris started the discussion on the XML CG list--see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2005Jul/thread.html#15 The XML CG will continue to discuss it for a while. 10. Henry raises that RFC 3023 is out of date and the draft replacement has expired. Chris has gotten the source and made the changes. There is a draft at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-02.tx t that can be reviewed now with comments sent to the XML Core mailing list and/or Chris Lilley. Paul sent some comments on 3023bis to the XML CG at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Apr/0026 Henry says Chris is going to take the XML CG input outlined at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Apr/0019 and produce another draft. Chris and Henry also are backing "xpointer scheme" down from "registered" to "pending" in the registry at http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/ ACTION to Henry: Correct the listing for "xpointer scheme" from "registered" to "pending" in the registry. We will now await a new draft from Chris. When 3023bis becomes a reality, we might have some specs that need updating for the reference, but we don't expect any major changes. [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Sep/0074
Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 15:11:18 UTC