Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 November 22

> > The latest C14N 1.1 editors draft is at
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/10/WD-xml-c14n11.html
> >

Henry has updated this link to the latest draft.  Thanks, Henry.

> > Konrad sent in some editorial comments at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Nov/0005
> >

I made all of the suggested changes except the following:

> 3. Maybe we should mention the support for xml:id

We are already crossing a line by adding the reference to xml:id
to Section 2.4 when it isn't strictly necessary.  One measure of
success in making these changes is that we don't need to mention
a new attribute added to the xml namespace in the C14N spec if it
doesn't have any specific handling requirements.  The thought is
that if the C14N 1.0 spec had used the wording that we are adding
then there wouldn't have been any great need to update the spec.
Given this it seemed inappropriate to make additional references
to xml:id attributes just to say that we don't do anything with
them.

If others believe that it would improve the spec to make such a
statement it would be easy enough to add.

> > ACTION to Glenn:  Make the editorial changes unless there are 
> > problems.
> >

Done