- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:04:26 -0400
- To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "Konrad Lanz" <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Richard, Just to check my understanding of one small part, when you say the base URI at some point is some URI whose last segment is a file name and/or fragment, what does this mean? I thought a base URI was effectively always a directory. So, for example, when you say base-uri="file://three/four/a.file", do you really mean the [base URI] is "file://three/four/"? paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, 2006 May 30 11:56 > To: Konrad Lanz; Richard Tobin > Cc: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Canonicalization xml:base processing > > I started looking at this and realised that I was likely to make > mistakes just in determining what the base URIs should be in the usual > case where the absolute base URI is available, so I thought I would > check we agree. > > Here is your example: > > > <a xml:base="one/two"> > > <b xml:base="//three/four/./five/./../file.xsd"> > > <c xml:base="a.file"/> > > <d> > > <e xml:base="#bare-name"> > > <f xml:base=""/> > > <f1/> > > </e> > > <g xml:base="//six/"/> > > </d> > > <h xml:base="http://www.iaik.tugraz.at"> > > <i xml:base="/aboutus/people/index.php"> > > <j xml:base="lanz/index.php"> > > </i> > > </h> > > </b> > > </a> > > Here it is with the base URIs added as an attribute on each element, > assuming that the document's URI is file:///tmp/foo.xml: > > <a base-uri="file:///tmp/one/two" xml:base="one/two"> > <b base-uri="file://three/four/./five/./../file.xsd" > xml:base="//three/four/./five/./../file.xsd"> > <c base-uri="file://three/four/a.file" > xml:base="a.file"/> > <d base-uri="file://three/four/./five/./../file.xsd"> > <e base-uri="file://three/four/#bare-name" > xml:base="#bare-name"> > <f base-uri="file://three/four/" > xml:base=""/> > <f1 base-uri="file://three/four/#bare-name"/> > </e> > <g base-uri="file://six/" > xml:base="//six/"/> > </d> > <h base-uri="http://www.iaik.tugraz.at" > xml:base="http://www.iaik.tugraz.at"> > <i > base-uri="http://www.iaik.tugraz.at/aboutus/people/index.php" > xml:base="/aboutus/people/index.php"> > <j > base-uri="http://www.iaik.tugraz.at/aboutus/people/lanz/index.php" > xml:base="lanz/index.php"/> > </i> > </h> > </b> > </a> > > I was surprised that <b> still has the . and .., but that is right > according to RFC2396: because the path is absolute, the algorithm is > not applied to it. The interpretation of xml:base="" and > xml:base="#fragment" are still in doubt. > > Do you agree with the above base URIs? > > -- Richard >
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 17:07:34 UTC