- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0500
- To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> There aren't any :-) Good point. An appendix such as you suggest (referenced from the Status) will probably satisfy pubrules and related W3C requirements. paul -----Original Message----- From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Tue 2006-03-21 10:28 To: Grosso, Paul; Richard Tobin; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: Namespaces 2nd editions > Not having a diff is okay, but then we do need something like an > appendix describing the major differences. There aren't any :-) In any case, for 1.0 we will have an appendix saying that it incorporates the errata and the editorial changes from 1.1. -- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:49:50 UTC