- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:49:30 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- CC: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, richard@inf.ed.ac.uk
John Cowan wrote: > Can you do a quick test here and send the results back to me? > The XML Core WG is looking into the behavior of XInclude > implementations on documents that contain an explicit > 'xml:base=""' attribute. > XOM produces this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <x xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"> <x xml:base="subdir/"> <x xml:base="one.xml"> Your XInclude processor supports xml:base </x> <x xml:base=""> <x xml:base="two.xml"> Your XInclude processor treats xml:base="" as return-to-enclosing document. </x> </x> </x> </x> > > ----- Forwarded message from Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> ----- > > From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:40:15 +0100 (BST) > Subject: xml:base, yet again > > Please point your XInclude implementation at > > http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/xinclude-base-test/start.xml > > and see what the result is. > > -- Richard > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:51:19 UTC