- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:16:37 -0400
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Monday, 2006 July 17 13:07 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Including a 1.1 entity in a 1.0 document > > / John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> was heard to say: > | In that case, the Third Edition of XML 1.0 would control, > which specifies > | that the text declaration of the external entity MUST > specify version 1.0. > | So it's a well-formedness error. > > Where do we say that an incorrect version is a WF error? > If there is an XMLDecl, the VersionInfo is required and the VersionNum [1] is the string '1.0' (per the 3rd Ed). A document is well-formed [2] if: 1. Taken as a whole, it matches the production labeled document. . . . paul [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-VersionNum [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#dt-wellformed
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 18:17:07 UTC