- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:50:34 -0500
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Cc: "public-xml-core-wg" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry > S. Thompson > Sent: Tuesday, 2006 January 24 9:35 > To: François Yergeau > Cc: public-xml-core-wg > Subject: [Bjoern Hoehrmann] Re: IRIEverywhere-27 > For those who, like me, got empty email from Henry, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jan/0039 which is a bit of a mess but at least is there. Here is my attempt to forward what Henry said: ------------ Could someone convince me that we _shouldn't_ do what Bjoern suggests here, i.e. include an appeal to Unicode Normalization [C] in the new universal IRI->URI algorithm? Doing so will remove a potential serious roadblock for XLink 1.1. I'm far from being an expert on this area, but to my naive eyes his argument (which is a reply to my claim that Character Encoding rules don't apply to IRI->URI mapping for XML specs, because they all start >From infoset values, which are defined as sequences of Unicode code points) seems valid. ht ----------- Then Henry quotes Bjoern's message from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Dec/0061 paul
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:50:50 UTC