Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 Nov 9

/ "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> was heard to say:
| 3.  XLink update.

I'm trying to make progress. From 
http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xlink11/lc-status/status-report.html
I suggest we discuss:

18. XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS
http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.LNX.4.62.0510122307310.23945@dhalsim.dreamhost.com

7. XLink 1.1: XPointer reference
http://www.w3.org/mid/u45ok1ln8jft2r6fks2v2cdgofk66cs5jg@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de

23. [xlink11] event handling of nested links
http://www.w3.org/mid/20050804130637.qnck3m2ii9c04s4g@webmail.annevankesteren.nl

| 10.  Henry added a "forking QNames" item:
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Nov/0000
|
| We had some discussion last week.
|
| Norm argues that we should object to the use of the
| QName syntax for things that aren't QNames.  He also
| objects to the invention of a new mechanism for declaring
| things that look like namespaces when they aren't really.
|
| ACTION to Norm:  Raise this concern at the TAG level.
|
| There was more discussion in email after last week's call.
|
| Where do we stand?

I haven't raised the issue yet because I wanted a clearer
understanding of what was being proposed. I'm still learning, but I
will raise the issue as soon as I can state it crisply.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.