Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 Nov 2

I had a discussion with John Boyer on the changes planned by the Core 
WG to Canonical XML.  He made the observation that it would be less 
disruptive to the C14N exploiters if we were to release these changes 
as Canonical XML 1.0 Second Edition than to produce a Canonical XML 
1.1 specification.

In addition, the XML-Signature Syntax and Processing spec [1] has 
explicit references to http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315 
and http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#WithComments. 
What are our intentions with respect to producing a new version of
the XML-Signature specification?  If we do not do so, what is the
effect of producing a revision to Canonical XML?

We need to discuss these issues.

Regards,

Glenn

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/