- From: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:46:27 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 15:46:38 UTC
I had a discussion with John Boyer on the changes planned by the Core WG to Canonical XML. He made the observation that it would be less disruptive to the C14N exploiters if we were to release these changes as Canonical XML 1.0 Second Edition than to produce a Canonical XML 1.1 specification. In addition, the XML-Signature Syntax and Processing spec [1] has explicit references to http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315 and http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#WithComments. What are our intentions with respect to producing a new version of the XML-Signature specification? If we do not do so, what is the effect of producing a revision to Canonical XML? We need to discuss these issues. Regards, Glenn [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 15:46:38 UTC