- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 09:36:49 -0400
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-style@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson > Sent: Monday, 09 May, 2005 7:46 > To: Chris Lilley > Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann; www-style@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: CSS selectors and xml:id > Well, here the CSS spec is providing an abstract interface, > the concept of > "attributes that are declared to be of type ID". It is then up to the > xml:id specification, or some other specification, to state > that xml:id attributes are of type ID. > > Unfortunately, the xml:id specification explicitly doesn't > say this. But > that is a problem with the xml:id spec (which I raised at > last call), not a problem with the CSS spec. Ian, is this the "ID assignment and the empty string" thread at http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html ? In that thread, the XML Core WG responded saying that we were changing the spec to refer to "ID type assignment", and you responded at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-id/2005Feb/0004 that this satisfied you. Do you believe that the wording at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-xml-id-20050208/ is still problematic in this regard? paul
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 13:38:32 UTC