- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:59:48 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Monday, May 9, 2005, 2:49:37 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Mon, 9 May 2005, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> BH> Could you propose text that should be added? >> >> If an implementation supports CSS 2.1 and also supports xml:id, then the >> xml:id attribute must be treated as an ID for the purposes of CSS >> selector processing. IH> This would be very bad because it would leave other ID-based APIs IH> (such as getElementById) ignorant of xml:id. Um, as you would say, getElementById is out of scope of CSS. The wording above does not affect xml:id processing in any way. It merely adds a conditional conformance clause on CSS implementations to actually do something with the reported value. IH> Fix the problem at the source, not at the symptom. I'm not seeing a problem. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 13:01:31 UTC