- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:20:49 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, 08 June, 2005 5:19 > To: Paul Grosso > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: DRAFT: Transition Request: PR Request forxml:id > > Paul Grosso writes: > > > The xml:id 1.0 specification was published as a Candidate > > Recommendation on 8 February 2005. The list of issues that > > were raised during CR and their disposition can be found at: > > @@@@@@@@@@@@@ [Where is this? Does it exist?] > > See recent message. > > > The implementation results are available at: > > http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ @@@@@@@ Norm this needs work > > I think we can/should cite the test suite and the report separately, > say > > The Working Group has developed a test suite for use in testing > interoperability, which is described at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/. > > An implementation report, describing the results of five > implementations, is available at [1]. > > ht > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html I'm confused here. My draft PR request email says: The test suite for xml:id is available at: http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/ The implementation results are available at: http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ @@@@@@@ Norm this needs work Isn't that citing them separately? The plan for the implementation results is that the page at the above URL (which already exists) will be a "cover page/overall report" and will also point to the individual implementation reports (already there). paul
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 13:20:58 UTC