- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:34:02 -0800
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Paul is right. And I never ever liked it and I still don't. -- Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, On Demand Operating Environment Standards Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:04 AM To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com> Subject: Re: XML 1.1 backwards compatibility On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:50:51AM -0500, Paul Grosso wrote: > > My memory is that the big reason we took out the C1 control > characters from 1.1 was that folks like Rick Jelliffe wanted > them to be an error so that we'd be able to catch more > encoding errors. > > [I was always dubious of that argument/decision, but maybe > I'm remembering things wrong/incompletely too.] that's my recollection too, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ |
Received on Saturday, 12 February 2005 15:34:37 UTC